Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
    • Philosophical Transactions B
    • Proceedings B
    • Biology Letters
    • Open Biology
    • Philosophical Transactions A
    • Proceedings A
    • Royal Society Open Science
    • Interface
    • Interface Focus
    • Notes and Records
    • Biographical Memoirs

Advanced

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest issue
    • All content
    • Subject collections
    • Special features
    • Videos
  • Information for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Readers
    • Institutions
  • About us
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Author benefits
    • Policies
    • Citation metrics
    • Publication times
    • Open access
  • Sign up
    • Subscribe
    • eTOC alerts
    • Keyword alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • Request a free trial
  • Submit
You have accessRestricted access

Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful

John P. Swaddle, Innes C. Cuthill
Published 22 July 1995.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0124
John P. Swaddle
Behavioural Biology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 IUG, U. K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Innes C. Cuthill
Behavioural Biology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 IUG, U. K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It has been postulated that levels of fluctuating asymmetry in human faces may be negatively related to components of fitness such as parasite-resistance; hence potential mates with low levels of asymmetry may appear more attractive. However, previous investigations of the relationship between asymmetry and facial attractiveness have confounded manipulations of asymmetry with facial ‘averageness’ and mean trait size. In this experiment we performed a manipulation that altered asymmetry within a face without altering the mean size of facial features. These faces were then rated on attractiveness. Contrary to what was predicted, faces that were made more symmetrical were perceived as being less attractive. These results do not support the hypothesis that attractiveness is related to low levels of fluctuating asymmetry. The observed positive relationship between asymmetry and facial attractiveness may be because certain facial features (including those contributing to attractiveness) in fact show directional asymmetry or antisymmetry. Our manipulations thus render naturally asymmetric features symmetrical. This may make symmetric faces less attractive because of the reduction of natural directional asymmetries, perhaps making the faces appear unemotional. The role of fluctuating asymmetries alone in assessments of facial beauty is still unknown, although this experiment suggests fluctuating asymmetry is relatively unimportant compared with directional asymmetry.

Footnotes

  • This text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR.

  • Received April 5, 1995.
  • Accepted May 2, 1995.
  • Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society

Royal Society Login

Sign in for Fellows of the Royal Society

Fellows: please access the online journals via the Fellows’ Room

Not a subscriber? Request a free trial

Log in using your username and password

Enter your Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article or this issue (from the computer you are currently using) for 30 days.

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article or Pay per Issue purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

PreviousNext
Back to top
PreviousNext
22 July 1995
Volume 261, issue 1360
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
Share
Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful
John P. Swaddle, Innes C. Cuthill
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1995 261 111-116; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0124. Published 22 July 1995
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences web site.
Print
Manage alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful

John P. Swaddle, Innes C. Cuthill
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1995 261 111-116; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0124. Published 22 July 1995

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Article reuse

Get Permission

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by

Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad

Open biology

  • PROCEEDINGS B
    • About this journal
    • Contact information
    • Purchasing information
    • Submit
    • Author benefits
    • Open access membership
    • Recommend to your library
    • FAQ
    • Help

Royal society publishing

  • ROYAL SOCIETY PUBLISHING
    • Our journals
    • Open access
    • Publishing policies
    • Conferences
    • Podcasts
    • News
    • Blog
    • Manage your account
    • Terms & conditions
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookies

The royal society

  • THE ROYAL SOCIETY
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Fellows
    • Events
    • Grants, schemes & awards
    • Topics & policy
    • Collections
    • Venue hire

Copyright © 2018 The Royal Society