Tameness and stress physiology in a predator-naive island species confronted with novel predation threat
- 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
- 2Department of Biological Rhythms & Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology 82346 Andechs, Germany
- 3Department of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm 89069 Ulm, Germany
- 4Department of Biology, Tufts University Medford, MA 02155, USA
- Author for correspondence (roedl{at}orn.mpg.de)
Abstract
Tame behaviour, i.e. low wariness, in terrestrial island species is often attributed to low predation pressure. However, we know little about its physiological control and its flexibility in the face of predator introductions. Marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) on the Galápagos Islands are a good model to study the physiological correlates of low wariness. They have lived virtually without predation for 5–15 Myr until some populations were first confronted with feral cats and dogs some 150 years ago. We tested whether and to what extent marine iguanas can adjust their behaviour and endocrine stress response to novel predation threats. Here, we show that a corticosterone stress response to experimental chasing is absent in naive animals, but is quickly restored with experience. Initially, low wariness also increases with experience, but remains an order of magnitude too low to allow successful escape from introduced predators. Our data suggest that the ability of marine iguanas to cope with predator introductions is limited by narrow reaction norms for behavioural wariness rather than by constraints in the underlying physiological stress system. In general, we predict that island endemics show flexible physiological stress responses but are restricted by narrow behavioural plasticity.
- anti-predator behaviour
- wariness
- corticosterone stress response
- island endemic
- introduced predator
- Galápagos
Footnotes
-
Electronic supplementary material is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3755 or via http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk.
-
- Received July 23, 2006.
- Accepted October 13, 2006.
- © 2006 The Royal Society








Social Networking