In table 1 of Cote et al. (2008), the table title contains incorrect significance values. The symbols (#p<0.10, *p<0.05) in the legend of table 1 did not match with those (*p<0.10, #p<0.05) in the table. Thus, all the significant results (p<0.05) appeared non-significant (p<0.10).
It is now presented correctly as:
- © 2008 The Royal Society