Conjugation genes are common throughout the genus Rickettsia and are transmitted horizontally

Lucy A. Weinert, John J. Welch, Francis M. Jiggins


Rickettsia are endosymbionts of arthropods, some of which are vectored to vertebrates where they cause disease. Recently, it has been found that some Rickettsia strains harbour conjugative plasmids and others encode some conjugative machinery within the bacterial genome. We investigated the distribution of these conjugation genes in a phylogenetically diverse collection of Rickettsia isolated from arthropods. We found that these genes are common throughout the genus and, in stark contrast to other genes in the genome, conjugation genes are frequently horizontally transmitted between strains. There is no evidence to suggest that these genes are preferentially transferred between phylogenetically related strains, which is surprising given that closely related strains infect similar host species. In addition to detecting patterns of horizontal transmission between diverse Rickettsia species, these findings have implications for the evolution of pathogenicity, the evolution of Rickettsia genomes and the genetic manipulation of intracellular bacteria.

1. Introduction

Rickettsia are facultative endosymbionts of arthropods, many of which are known to be transmitted vertically from mother to offspring (reviewed in Perlman et al. 2006; Weinert et al. 2009). A small proportion of strains are also vectored to humans and other vertebrate hosts where they cause diseases such as typhus fever and Rocky Mountain spotted fever (Azad & Beard 1998). In addition, some strains have evolved adaptations to help them spread through arthropod populations, such as killing male hosts in order to redistribute resources to infected female siblings (Lawson et al. 2001; Weinert et al. 2007), or inducing parthenogenesis to make all of the infected hosts female (the sex that will transmit the bacterium; Hagimori et al. 2006).

Owing to their medical importance, the genomes of 14 strains of Rickettsia have been sequenced. These genomes are smaller than those of their free-living counterparts and contain a larger proportion of pseudogenes and non-coding DNA. This is indicative of genome degradation consistent with relaxed selection (owing to substitution of gene products by the host), ineffective selection (owing to small effective population size and limited recombination; Balbi et al. 2009) and a mutational bias towards deletions (Andersson & Andersson 2001). Rickettsia genomes also encode for less recombination machinery (Andersson et al. 1998), which is reflected in very low recombination rates between Rickettsia strains, both when compared with free-living bacteria and with endosymbionts in the closely related genus Wolbachia (Klasson et al. 2009; Weinert et al. 2009). Rickettsia genomes are also more syntenic than Wolbachia genomes (Eremeeva et al. 2005; Fenn et al. 2006). However, not all Rickettsia genomes show these characteristics, and the recently published genomes of Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia bellii are larger, are less syntenic and have many transposases and proteins with domains involved in protein–protein interactions such as ankyrin repeats and tetratricopeptide repeats (Ogata et al. 2005, 2006; Darby et al. 2007). The reasons for these qualitative differences in the genome architecture remain unknown, but one possible factor is the presence or absence of conjugation.

Conjugation is an ancient mechanism of horizontal gene transfer that occurs between bacteria through cell contact. This transfer is usually mediated by a plasmid, using a set of conjugation genes (Tra genes) that control its regulation, the synthesis of a mating pilus, stabilization contact and DNA metabolism (Clewell 1993). Rickettsia bellii has a full complement of these conjugation genes, encoded on its chromosome (Ogata et al. 2006). Rickettsia felis, on the other hand, has conjugation genes encoded on a plasmid (Ogata et al. 2005), and while these appear to be a partial cluster, pili have been observed linking R. felis cells, suggesting that conjugation may occur (Ogata et al. 2005). Knowledge of conjugation elsewhere in the genus is sketchier. Rickettsia massiliae, like R. bellii, has a full complement of chromosomal conjugation genes, but this appears to be a very recent transfer event (Blanc et al. 2007), and no other complete clusters are known (Eremeeva et al. 2005; Blanc et al. 2007). Partial Tra clusters are known, but are non-functional in some cases (e.g. Rickettsia monacensis; Ogata et al. 2005; Baldridge et al. 2007). Despite these examples, present sampling effort would suggest that conjugation systems are not very common in Rickettsia, although there is evidence to suggest that plasmids may be lost through passage in cell culture before genome sequencing (Baldridge et al. 2008). As such, the connection, if any, between conjugation and other genomic features remains unclear.

Equally unclear is the broader role of conjugative genes in Rickettsia biology. Importantly, however, there is some evidence that they may play a role in pathogenicity. Specifically, the R. felis plasmid contains several candidate virulence genes (Ogata et al. 2005). In addition, there are two genes that encode proteins with ankyrin repeat domains and seven genes with tetratricopeptide repeat motifs, all of which may be involved in protein–protein interactions (Gillespie et al. 2007). Proteins with ankyrin repeat domains are common in eukaryotic chromosomes, but are rare in bacteria. However, they have recently been found in a suite of intracellular bacteria, and some are known to be exported from the bacterial cell, which suggests a role in pathogenicity (Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al. 2005; Cho et al. 2007; Pan et al. 2008).

The aim of this study is to determine the distribution of conjugation genes across Rickettsia, as a first step in determining their role in the evolution and biology of the genus. Rickettsia are widespread among arthropods, and many of these bacteria branch from near the base of the Rickettsia phylogeny (Weinert et al. 2009). Based on the phylogenetic analyses of the R. felis plasmid genes with homologous genes encoded in Rickettsia genomes, it has been suggested that many of the conjugation genes have come from these ‘ancestral’ Rickettsia (Gillespie et al. 2007). Therefore, we experimentally tested this hypothesis by using PCR to detect the presence of conjugation genes in the new strains of Rickettsia we have isolated from arthropods (Weinert et al. 2009). In addition, we tested whether conjugation gene phylogenies are decoupled from the bacterial phylogeny, to investigate whether they are being transferred horizontally between bacterial strains.

2. Methods

(a) Identification of conjugation genes

(i) Polymerase chain reaction

Conjugation genes are highly conserved, so we aligned their protein sequences and designed primers in conserved regions to allow their detection by PCR. The conjugation genes in Rickettsia are either similar to the Agrobacterium tumificens plasmid (TI-type) or the Escherichia coli F plasmid (F-type). These two types of plasmids are unrelated and are classified into separate conjugation systems (Garcillán-Barcia et al. 2009), so we have added the suffix TI or F to indicate this difference. We tested 13 different strains of Rickettsia that were isolated from arthropod hosts (figure 1). Primers were designed using genes from both R. felis (where the genes are found on a plasmid) and R. bellii (where the genes are chromosomal); these are referred to as felis-type and bellii-type, respectively. In addition, as conjugation genes are usually found in close proximity to each other, primers were designed in some genes to amplify sequences between the genes detected (as gene orientations from unsequenced Rickettsia are unknown, primers were designed in all orientations for the TraDTI and TraATI felis-type genes and TraATI and TraDTI bellii-type genes, which were the most common genes detected). All PCR primers and conditions are given in table S1 in the electronic supplementary material. The sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers GQ344475GQ344478 and GQ365372GQ365409.

Figure 1.

The phylogeny of Rickettsia indicating the presence or absence of conjugation genes. Rickettsia strains that do not have species names are indicated by the name of their host prefixed by (s). The coloured areas over the phylogenetic tree show the different phylogenetic groups of Rickettsia, and posterior support for each clade on the phylogeny is given along the branch length (and is consistent with ML bootstrap support; data not shown). Subscripts of the different conjugation genes indicate either a similarity to the A. tumificens plasmid (TI-type) or the E. coli F plasmid (F-type). Also indicated is whether genes show closer similarity to the R. felis plasmid or the R. bellii genome. The genes were detected by either PCR or BLAST searches of published genomes. Four Rickettsia strains remain untested for some genes because of a paucity of DNA, and the bellii-type genes of R. monacensis remain untested because the genome is unsequenced. +, presence of gene; −, absence of gene; empty, gene not detected by PCR; slash, gene not tested; 1, non-functional; 2, found on plasmid.

(ii) BLAST

In order to investigate the presence of conjugation genes in the sequenced Rickettsia genomes, we used all of the currently identified conjugation genes from R. felis and R. bellii to perform BLAST searches. The tblastx program, which translates the query sequence and matches it against a translated database, was used to search for possible homologues in the Rickettsia genomes (the genomes and search tool are found at and in the related genus Orientia ( In addition, two BLAST programs were used to compare the conjugation genes with all nucleotide sequences in GenBank: the computationally intensive tblastx for shorter sequences (less than 300 bp) and the discontiguous megablast algorithm in blastn for larger sequences. Both approaches are designed to pick up less-similar sequences.

(b) Phylogeny

The phylogeny of the 13 arthropod Rickettsia, together with the 11 different Rickettsia species whose genomes have been sequenced and a bacterium from the related genus Orientia, was reconstructed from four multi-locus strain type (MLST) genes: atpA, coxA, gltA and 16S rDNA (the sequencing and phylogeny of these genes are described in Weinert et al. 2009). The endosymbiont of Coccidula rufa was excluded as it is a recombinant strain whose phylogenetic position is uncertain (Weinert et al. 2009). Phylogenies of the conjugation genes were constructed for genes that were detected in six or more strains of bacteria. This included the TraDTI, TraATI and TraDF genes, which were similar to those first identified from the R. felis plasmid, and TraATI, TraDF and TraBF, which were similar to those first identified from the R. bellii chromosome. In two cases, the same conjugation genes (TraDTI and TraATI) were found on the plasmid of R. felis and the chromosome of R. bellii, but the gene sequences are too divergent to align accurately. The exception was TraDF from both types, which could easily be aligned at the protein level and was therefore incorporated into a single gene tree.

The optimal substitution model for each gene was selected using hierarchical likelihood ratio tests in the program Modeltest v. 3.7 (Posada & Crandall 1998). Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenies were then created, and support for the different nodes were obtained using 1000 bootstrap replicates and posterior probabilities, respectively. Maximum-likelihood phylogenies were built using a maximally parsimonious tree (created using the tree bisection and reconnection branch swapping methods) as a starting tree and then searching tree space using the nearest neighbour interchange branch swapping method in PAUP v. 4b10 (Swofford 2003). Bayesian phylogenies were created using the program MrBayes (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001) to run the MC3 algorithm for 1 000 000 generations, with three heated chains and one cold chain, discarding the first 25 per cent of the posterior distribution as burn-in.

(c) Phylogenetic tests

(i) Comparing gene trees with the multi-locus strain-type tree

To test whether the phylogenies of the conjugation genes differed significantly from the MLST tree, we used two different methods. First, taking a Bayesian approach, we calculated the posterior probability that the conjugation gene conformed to the MLST topology (this is estimated by the proportion of the posterior sample of gene trees generated by MrBayes, in which the topology corresponded to the MLST topology). Second, we used a parametric bootstrap or SOWH test of each conjugation gene (Swofford et al. 1996; Goldman et al. 2000). To carry out these tests, we first calculated the difference between the log likelihood of the maximum-likelihood tree inferred from the conjugation gene sequences (‘ML tree’) and the log likelihood when these sequences were forced to take the topology of the MLST tree (‘null tree’). The observed difference in likelihood was then compared with a distribution of likelihood differences obtained from 1000 datasets simulated under the null hypothesis that the true conjugation gene topology is the MLST tree (Rambaut & Grassly 1997). Each set of simulated sequences was evolved on the topology, branch lengths and model parameters of the null tree. The difference in the log likelihood between the ML and null trees was then recalculated for each of the 1000 simulated datasets. The p-value was then calculated as the proportion of the simulated datasets for which the likelihood difference was larger than that of the real data.

(ii) Conjugation gene incongruence test

To test whether conjugation genes differed in their evolutionary histories, we also used Bayesian and likelihood-based parametric bootstrap approaches. For the latter, an ML phylogeny was estimated, in which both genes were constrained to the same topology, but each had a unique substitution model and unique branch lengths. The likelihood value was then compared with that obtained when both genes were allowed their own topologies. The observed increase in likelihood was compared with those obtained from 1000 datasets simulated under the null model (different substitution patterns and rates, but a common topology).

(iii) Mantel tests

To investigate whether conjugation genes were being preferentially transferred between closely related strains, we tested whether there was a significant correlation in genetic distance between conjugation genes and the MLST genes (Mantel 1967). Pairwise and patristic (branch length) differences were calculated between taxa in the MLST alignment and between taxa in the six different conjugation gene alignments. A correlation coefficient was then calculated between MLST distances and conjugation distances for taxa that were shared between the two phylogenies. Significance of the correlation coefficient was calculated by permuting the conjugation gene taxa names over the MLST taxa names 10 000 times and recalculating the correlation coefficient each time to produce the null distribution. The p-value was then obtained using a one-tailed test.

3. Results

(a) Presence of conjugation genes

We used PCR to test a phylogenetically diverse collection of 13 strains of Rickettsia for the presence of conjugation genes and combined these results with BLAST searches of the published genomes of Rickettsia and the related genus Orientia. The pattern of gene presence and absence is summarized in figure 1.

With the PCR approach, 11 of the 13 strains tested positive for at least one conjugation gene, suggesting that conjugation genes are present in most Rickettsia lineages (figure 1; PCR products were sequenced in all cases). In one case, the sequence of the conjugation genes contained an internal stop codon, indicating that it no longer encodes a functional protein. We could not detect any conjugation genes in the Rickettsia strains found in the ladybird Adalia bipunctata from Moscow (strain 10J) or the ladybird Halyzia sedecimguttata. However, the lack of a PCR product is not confirmation that the genes are not present, as they might not have been amplified if the genes are too divergent for the primers to anneal or if they have been truncated (as is common in Rickettsia conjugation genes). In addition to these findings, we also detected polymorphism in the sequencing reads at some sites in some genes of the symbionts of Rhizobius chrysomeloides, Brachys tessellatus, C. rufa, Adalia decempunctata and Calvia quattuordecimguttata, which indicate duplication events or multiple plasmids. However, this does not impact our phylogenetic analysis as the divergence between the copies was very small compared with the divergence between conjugation genes of different strains. The BLAST searches of Rickettsia genomes confirmed that only five of the eleven named species contained conjugation genes. A list of gene identifiers of the best BLAST hits used in constructing conjugation gene phylogenies is given in table S2 in the electronic supplementary material. The genomes that lack these genes fall into a closely related cluster of vertebrate pathogens, so it appears that the ancestral Rickettsia probably possessed conjugation genes, implying that they have only recently been lost from many of the vertebrate pathogens (figure 1).

Figure 1 also reveals patterns of co-occurrence between the genes that are close in sequence to the R. felis plasmid (felis-type) and those that are closer to the R. bellii genome (bellii-type), which have not yet been found on plasmids. It is clear that genes of both felis- and bellii-type tend to co-occur, with most strains having either several genes of a particular type or none at all (figure 1). Genes of both types also occur in all four of the main Rickettsia clades studied, and bellii-type genes are also found in the closely related Orientia tsutsugamushi.

(b) Independent introductions of TI-type conjugation genes into Rickettsia

BLAST searches of the conjugation genes across all sequences in GenBank also revealed differences in the evolutionary histories of the genes from the two separate conjugation systems: F-type and TI-type. F-type conjugation genes appear to constitute a Rickettsia-specific clade, with TraBF and TraDF (from both R. felis and R. bellii) giving best hits to all other Rickettsia sequences. In contrast, the TI-type conjugation genes seemed to have originated from two independent transfers into Rickettsia. A tblastx search of the TraATI gene from R. bellii indicated that this gene is more similar to TraATI genes from numerous other bacteria than it is to the TraATI gene from the R. felis plasmid, with the reciprocal tblastx giving a similar result. The TraDTI gene from R. bellii also gave a higher similarity to other bacteria, although the reciprocal tblastx query gave a significant hit only to the TraDTI genes of various Rickettsia species. Phylogenies based on the tblastx output showing evidence of separate origins for the TraATI and TraDTI genes are given in fig. S1 in the electronic supplementary material.

(c) Synteny of conjugation genes is broken

To investigate whether conjugation genes are syntenic in different species, we attempted to amplify the region between some of the genes (see §2). All attempts but one failed, implying that these conjugation genes are not in the same orientation as they are found in on the R. felis plasmid or on the R. bellii chromosome. The only successful PCR amplified the region between the felis-type genes TraATI and TraDTI from the endosymbiont of A. decempunctata and gave a product that was larger than expected. Sequencing showed that, relative to the R. felis plasmid, two genes were inserted between the conjugation genes, and the TraDTI gene was in the opposite orientation; this is illustrated in figure 2. In addition, this four-gene fragment of (s)A. decempunctata gave a blastn hit to the nucleotide sequence from the R. monacensis plasmid, indicating the same pattern in R. monacensis. This is surprising given that R. monacensis is more closely related to R. felis than to the symbiont of A. decempunctata.

Figure 2.

Lack of synteny in the conjugation genes in R. felis compared with R. monacensis and the symbiont of A. decempunctata. Small arrows represent the position of the PCR primers.

(d) Phylogenetic incongruence of multi-locus strain type and conjugation genes

To test whether conjugation genes are horizontally transmitted between Rickettsia strains, we reconstructed maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenies of conjugation genes that were detected in six or more strains of bacteria. These included TraDTI and TraATI of felis-type and TraDTI, TraDF, TraATI and TraBF of bellii-type and are depicted in figure 3. The two genes TraDTI and TraATI were found in both the R. felis and R. bellii clusters, but as the BLAST searches suggested independent introductions of TI-type genes into Rickettsia, we analysed them separately (they are, in any case, too divergent to align with confidence). In contrast, the two felis-type TraDF were combined with the bellii-type genes into a single phylogeny (figure 3d).

Figure 3.

Phylogeny of conjugation genes detected in six or more strains of Rickettsia (a) TraDTI (felis-type), (b) TraATI3′ (felis-type), (c) TraATI5′ (felis-type), (d) TraDF (bellii- and felis-type), (e) TraATI (bellii-type), (f) TraBF (bellii-type) and (g) TraDTI (bellii-type). The felis-type TraATI gene is considerably larger than other conjugation genes (figure 2), and we sequenced two fragments separately. However, as incongruence was confirmed by a parametric bootstrap test (see §2; probability of a common topology: p = 0.002), the phylogenies are depicted separately in (b) and (c). Scale bars represent the number of substitutions per site. Posterior support is given along the branches (and is consistent with ML bootstrap support; data not shown). Coloured boxes represent the different phylogenetic groups of Rickettsia, as shown in figure 1.

(i) Phylogenetic tests

We used two tests to investigate whether the phylogenies of the conjugation genes differed significantly from the phylogeny of the bacteria (reconstructed from the MLST genes). For our Bayesian trees, we calculated the posterior probability that each gene topology corresponded to the MLST topology. For our maximum-likelihood trees, we carried out SOWH tests. Results, in table 1, show that in all cases the phylogenies of the conjugation genes differed significantly from those of the four MLST genes. This strongly suggests extensive horizontal gene transfer of conjugation genes in Rickettsia.

View this table:
Table 1.

Bayesian and SOWH tests for incongruence between the bacterial MLST phylogeny (figure 1) and the individual conjugation gene trees (figure 3); and Mantel tests for a correlation between the genetic distances of the conjugation genes and other genes (see text for full details). Also shown are the best-fit models of sequence evolution: TrN + Γ5 (Tamura–Nei with a five-category discretized gamma distribution of rates across sites) and HKY + Γ5 (Hasegawa, Kishino and Yano with a gamma distribution; Posada & Crandall 1998). The Mantel test on pairwise differences is absent for the gene TraBF because the Rickettsia canadensis gene is truncated and does not overlap with the sequence from some of the other symbionts. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.07; ***p < 0.001.

(e) No evidence that conjugation genes co-speciate with the bacteria or preferentially move between closely related bacterial strains

While it is apparent that the conjugation gene phylogenies are extensively decoupled from the MLST phylogeny, there also seems to be a few cases in which closely related strains of Rickettsia have related conjugation genes. For example, on the TraDTI (felis-type) phylogeny (figure 3a), symbionts of the parasitoid wasp genus Aulogymnus group together with strong posterior support (93%), which is also the case on the bacterial phylogeny (figure 1). These associations could indicate vertical transmission of conjugation genes, or that conjugation genes move preferentially between related strains of bacteria. However, the associations might also have arisen by chance. To distinguish between these possibilities, we used Mantel tests of independence between the MLST and conjugation gene trees (Mantel 1967; see §2). Table 1 shows that the tests in some cases reach marginal significance, but when multiple testing is considered, the degree of association appears no larger than would be expected by chance.

(f) Patterns of horizontal transfer

Horizontal transfer of conjugation genes seems to occur more often between the major groups than within the major groups. Figure 3 shows the phylogeny of the conjugation genes coloured as in figure 1 according to the group of Rickettsia host from which they were isolated (major groups defined by Weinert et al. 2009). Although numerous examples exist of between-group transfer where groups are not monophyletic (e.g. in figure 3a,c,e) and have a different order of divergence (e.g. in figure 3b,d,f), there is evidence for only two cases of horizontal transfer within the adalia group in figure 3a,b.

4. Discussion

We have found that conjugation genes are common in the genus Rickettsia, including those strains thought to exclusively infect arthropods, which represent the majority of the group (Weinert et al. 2009). Most of the strains tested here are positive for the R. felis plasmid-type genes (figure 1), and since this class of conjugation genes has so far only been discovered on a plasmid (Ogata et al. 2005; Baldridge et al. 2007), this suggests that plasmids may be common in the genus. However, further experiments will be needed to establish the physical position of these elements. These results are in contrast to other obligate intracellular pathogens, only a handful of which contain conjugative plasmids (Samuel et al. 1983; Stephens et al. 1998; Ogata et al. 2005; Gillespie et al. 2007).

We have also shown that conjugation genes within Rickettsia undergo horizontal transfer at a high rate. This is in stark contrast to the rest of genome, in which horizontal transfer is rare (Weinert et al. 2009). Furthermore, most cases of movement of conjugation genes are between different major groups, and there is no evidence for any correspondence between the bacterial phylogeny and the conjugation gene phylogeny (table 1). Therefore, there is no evidence that the conjugation genes preferentially move between closely related strains or co-speciate with the bacteria. This is surprising, given that related strains of Rickettsia tend to infect related arthropod hosts and suggest a high rate of DNA transfer over evolutionary time.

We have further found evidence of two separate evolutionary origins of conjugation genes in Rickettsia. The F-type conjugation genes that we identified appeared to constitute a Rickettsia-specific clade, and the significant divergence between copies of these genes suggests that they have been evolving in Rickettsia for some time. This raises the question as to why these genes have been maintained in Rickettsia. It is possible that some plasmids exist as entirely selfish elements, but this would require a high degree of infectious transmission (Paulsson 2002), which seems unlikely given the intracellular lifestyle of Rickettsia. The Rickettsia strains we have studied probably only infect arthropods and probably have a biology similar to the related genus Wolbachia. Wolbachia also has an extremely high rate of horizontal gene transfer, thought to be driven by a phage (Klasson et al. 2009). Also, in Wolbachia, mobile genetic elements are associated with differences in the way in which the bacteria manipulate the reproduction of the host insect (Sinkins et al. 2005), and it is therefore tempting to speculate that conjugative elements may play a role in the exchanging genes that control the reproductive manipulation of Rickettsia hosts. Although this is purely speculative, the lack of these genes in strains that infect vertebrates argues against a role in vertebrate pathogenicity. Indeed, unlike many other bacteria, horizontally transferred elements in Rickettsia are not associated with vertebrate pathogenicity (Darby et al. 2007).

The presence of a system that can horizontally transfer DNA between Rickettsia species is likely to have an important effect on the evolution of these strains. The intracellular lifestyle and maternal transmission of these bacteria reduce their effective population size and increase their mutation rate. Consequently, endosymbionts suffer the accumulation of deleterious mutations owing to Muller's ratchet and interference selection (Moran 1996). Horizontal gene transfer can counteract these problems by allowing deleterious mutations to be purged from the population. Indeed, there seems to be evidence of ‘regenerative’ DNA exchange in Neisseria (Treangen et al. 2008). However, if most of the genome is not experiencing recombination (Weinert et al. 2009), this argues against conjugation genes affecting Rickettsia in this particular way.

Processes such as Muller's ratchet have led to small genomes of largely essential genes, and this may create another problem, as these genomes may have limited potential to evolve novel traits. This is likely to be a particular problem for Rickettsia, as most strains are probably parasites and will therefore face strong selection pressures from host resistance. Horizontal gene transfer can counteract these problems by providing novel genes or combinations of genes. Indeed, in other bacteria, genes involved in pathogenicity are often carried on mobile genetic elements such as plasmids. Therefore, a conjugative system that horizontally transfers DNA in Rickettsia suggests a higher probability of acquiring novel traits, which may facilitate epidemic outbreaks, given that Rickettsia are classified as potential emerging pathogens (Walker & Ismail 2008). However, many of the vertebrate pathogenic Rickettsia lack conjugation genes, which suggests that, in these cases, conjugation genes are not important in vertebrate pathogenicity.

If plasmids are widespread among arthropod Rickettsia, they could be exploited in a range of applications. For example, it has been suggested that bacterial endosymbionts could be used to drive genes through insect populations in order to block the transmission of disease (Sinkins & Gould 2006). However, this has been hampered by the difficulty of transforming symbionts such as Wolbachia. It is possible that Rickettsia may be a more promising system to use in the genetic manipulation of populations. Although transposon-based mutagenesis has seen significant recent advances in Rickettsia biology (Liu et al. 2007) and greatly facilitates functional genetic analysis, no system currently exists to deliver foreign genes into Rickettsia, so a natural genetic transformation tool is a distinct advantage.

In conclusion, the presence of plasmids in Rickettsia is an exciting discovery that is likely to reveal insights into the biology of the different strains and may be a useful tool in the genetic manipulation of intracellular bacteria.


We are indebted to Remy Ware and Mike Majerus for collecting and sending infected ladybirds. We also thank Greg Hurst and Andrew Rambaut for comments on a preliminary draft. L.A.W. is supported by postgraduate NERC funding. F.M.J. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.

  • Received May 21, 2009.
  • Accepted June 25, 2009.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


View Abstract